8 Petrarch’s source is Pliny, Historia naturalia, tr. W.H.S. Jones (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963), Book 29, 1-8; Petrarch makes repeated use of Pliny, see especially, the Invective, henceforth cited as ICM, I, 828; II, 868, 872; III, 912.
9 The classification of medicine as a mechanical art can be found con Hugh of St. 11; Petrarch refers onesto medicine as a mechanical art also con XII, 2, 454, 466, 473-4.
10 Fracassetti, Lettere senile, vol. 2, 242-3, translates verso passage not found per Bernardo’s edition: “Ecco volubilita di professione, quasi ed inutilita della ricetta,” XII, 2.
The continuing popularity of the Conciliator is attested by per seventeenth-century estratto, Conciliator enucleatus seu differentiarum philosophicarum et medicarum petri apponensis Compendium, Gregori Lorsti, acad
11 Peirce, “How to Make Our Ideas Clear,” Writings, vol. 3, 263-4: “The bath https://datingranking.net/it/swingstown-review/ of verso belief is the establishment of verso habit, and different beliefs are distinguished by the different modes of action to which they give rise.”
V. Nutton remarks that verso good manuscript of Galen’s works was available at the papal capable sopra 1353, John Caius and the Manuscripts of Galen, (Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society, 1987), vol
12 On Petrarch and the dialecticians see Pietro Paolo Gerosa, Umanesimo comprensivo del Petrarca; Prestigio agostiniana, attinenze medievali (Turin: Dispensa d’Erasmo, 1966), 208f. 13. Petrarch seems preciso collapse dialectic and logic; on this issue see Eleonore Stump, Dialectic and its Place per the Development of Medieval Logic (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989).
14 Petrarch is not above employing syllogizing, con deepest irony, of course; see ICM, III, 932: “Certe ego nunc risu et verecundia impedior sillogismum tibi tuo parem mittere, quo probem te vilissime servum rei. Quod urbanius possum dicam: sinon quod alio spectat, et ad aliud refertur, et propter aliud est inventum, illi serviat oportet, ut manque vis. Cura autem abima pecumian spectat et ad illam refertur et propter illam est. Conclude, dyaletice: allora pecunie domestica levante.”
15 Petrarch also argues that the more necessary is not by that more noble: “Igitur putas necessitas artium nobilitatem arguat. Contra levante; alioquin nobilissimus artificum erit agricola; sutor quoque et pistor et cache, si mactare desieris, per precio eritis,” ICM, III, 894-6; cf. III, 910.
16 “. . . the doctor had done nothing at all, nor could he have except what per loquacious dialectician, rich mediante boredom and lacking per remedies, can do”; “Medicum nil omnino vel fecisse, vel facere potuisse, nisi quod dialecticus loquax potest, taedii dives, inopsque remedii.”
18 I use the edition, Conciliator controversarium quae inter philosophos eet medicos versantur (Venice: apud Juntas, 1548). Nancy Siraisi’s conciliabule of d’Abano in Arts and Sciences at Padua; The Studium of Padua before 1350 (Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies, 1973), is excellent. D’Abano notes the attack on him as Averroist by the Dominicans mediante Differentia 48; Nardi contests the notion of d’Abano as Averroist in “La opinione dell’anima di nuovo la vita delle forme conformemente Pietro d’Abano,” 1-17, and “Attorno alle dottrine filosofiche di Pietro d’Abano,” durante Studi sulla tradizione aristotelica nel Veneto, I: Saggi sull’Aristotelismo padovano dal tempo XIV at XVI (Florence: Sansoni, 1958), 19-74. P. Ovverosia. Kristeller makes the point that Petrarch’s opponents per the De sui ipsius et multorum ignorantia were probably Bolognese, not Paduans, durante “Petrarch’s ‘Averroists’; Verso Note on the History of Aristotelianism mediante Venice, Padua, and Bologna,” Bibliotheque d’Humanisme et Renaissance, 14 (1952), 59-65. Giessena (Giessae: Casparus Chemlinus, 1621).
19 Lynn Thorndike, “Translations from the Greek by Pietro d’Abano,” Isis, 33 (1942), 649-53; see also V. Nutton, “Galen on Prognosis,” Insieme medicorum graecorum, 8.1.1 (1979), 27.
21 See the argument cited per Differentia 3, (8r): “. . . medicari non levante scientia fortuite: sed quidam actus et labor particularis, et de tali assenza oriente scientia . . . regulat sopra actu operandi particularem et tunc consequitor medicinae finis perfecte, quod ostenditur.”