In-breadth interviews (IDI)

Twenty communities where SS was presented was in fact chosen randomly regarding a complete list of two hundred towns where studies got occurred anywhere between , i.age. 1-three years up until the questionnaire. From every one of these 20 SS towns, we picked that past trainee to own a partial-arranged, in-breadth interviews. Half of was picked at random regarding an email list prepared by KHPT employees of men and women which it staff think had gained from knowledge: additional 1 / 2 of was picked at random in the big listing out-of students. All the selected SS students was also expected www.datingranking.net/tr/datingcom-inceleme/ to identify anybody you like having interviews, someone having just who they shared a near relationships. These were perhaps not told of cause for the brand new interviews. The brand new interviews have been conducted from the local vernacular by the interviewers taught when you look at the partial-arranged choosing. Issues included their viewpoints for the SS education, trick knowledge gained and you may mutual, point of views to your private attitudinal and you may behavioural transform, and you can opinions towards the transform owing to SS, amongst their family members as well as in the community. Most of the IDI transcripts was in fact analyzed by hand getting constant themes and you will facts.

Polling Unit Studies (PBS)

Polling Booth Surveys (PBS) have been used by KHPT and others to obtain information on delicate subjects such as sexual practices; the methodology has been reported elsewhere . In summary, participants are interviewed in a group, though each person is behind a polling booth-type screen. The PBS sessions were conducted by trained PBS facilitators in the local vernacular in 40 villages: 20 where SS had been conducted in 2005, and 20 where no such training had been done. First we divided each village into 6 segments and randomly assigned each segment to one of the following 6 groups (unmarried women and unmarried men, younger married women and men, older married women and men). In each segment, one house was selected at random as a “starter” house. In this home, we listed all members of the household. If any person satisfied the criteria for inclusion, we requested their participation (if there was more than one such person in the house, we selected one at random). Then working to the left, we followed the same procedure in each house until we had invited 12 people in the appropriate group, giving an approximate total invited sample of 1440 respondents in the 20 SS villages and 1440 in the 20 non-SS villages. We were able to poll 1196 respondents in SS villages (83% response) and 1297 (90% response) in other villages, with a combined sample of 2493 (87% response). In addition, as many SS trainees as possible from the 20 Stepping Stones villages, were convenience-sampled to participate in a separate PBS session. In all 414 former trainees were sampled. Questions were a mixture of ones used in previous KHPT PBS and some were taken from the GEM Scale . The questions focused on knowledge, attitude and behaviour and involved yes/no or don’t know/not applicable responses. The knowledge and attitude questions were the same for all groups, but the behaviour questions differed according to what was appropriate for the specific group. All PBS data were entered into Excel spreadsheets and differences between groups were calculated using a chi-squared test. Preliminary analysis found that the general population samples were very similar; however the SS group profile was different to that of the general population samples (p < 0.01, Table 1), so the data from the SS trainee group were adjusted directly, using the stratum-specific denominator of the SS general population group as the standard population. Differences between groups were then calculated in STATA version 10 (STATA Corporation, USA) and p values calculated using a z-test (test of equality between proportions).